 | Wreck report for 'Nolisement', 1943 |  |  | This resource is available to view as a PDF document. Click
here to view 'Wreck report for 'Nolisement', 1943'. You will need a PDF viewer to view this document. Tell me more... |
|
|
|  | | Unique ID: | 14165 | | Description: | Board of Trade wreck report for 'Nolisement', 1943. | | Creator: | GB Board of Trade | | Date: | 24/9/1943 | | Copyright: | Out of copyright | | Partner: | SCC Libraries | | Partner ID: | Unknown |
Transcription
THE MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT, 1894. REPORT CF COURT No. 7938 s.s. "NOLISEMENT" In the matter of a Formal Investigation held at Cardiff on the
22nd 23rd and 24th days of September 1943 before R.F. Hayward Esq.,
K.C. assisted by Captains Piers de Legh and Evan Jones into the
circumstances attending the stranding of the steamship "NOLISEMENT"
in the neighbourhood of the Carrick Rocks Vaaish Bay, Isle of
Man. The Court having carefully inquired into the circumstances
attending the above-mentioned shipping casualty, finds for the
reasons stated in the Annex hereto, that the master Captain Thomas
James Williamson was in default and censures him severely. The
Court also finds that the second officer Mr. Edmund Thomas Ward was
in default and censures him. Dated this 24th day of September, 1943. We concur in the above Report. | | Piors de Legh. | Assessor. | | | Evan Jones. | Assessor. |
ANNEX TO THE REPORT MR. E.M. PARSEY (of the Treasury Solicitor's Department)
appeared for the Minister of War Transport. MR. R.E. GETHING(instructed by Messrs. Ingledew, Brown,
Bennison & Garrett) appeared as Counsel for the Master, Captain
T.J. Williamson. MR. E.W. BRIGHTMAN (instructed by Messrs. Gilbert
Robertson & Co.) appeared as counsel for the Owners, Nolisement
Steamship Company, Ltd., of Cardiff.
THE SECOND OFFICER (Mr. Edmund Thomas Ward) appeared in
person.
The "NOLISEMENT", owned by the Nolisement Steamship Company,
Ltd., of Cardiff, and managed by the Merel Steamship Company, Ltd.,
also of Cardiff, is a single screw steel steam-ship built in 1928
at Howden-on-Tyne by the Northumberland Shipbuilding Company
(1927), Ltd. She is 5084.47 tons gross and 3146.88 registered
tonnage, 412 feet in length, 55 feet in beam, and 29 feet in depth.
She is fitted with wireless telegraphy and direction finders and a
sounding machine of the Kelvin type. Her crew of 48 hands included
three wireless operators. She was fitted with three compasses -
steering compass in the wheelhouse, standard compass on the top of
the wheelhouse, and a steering compass aft which was not adjusted
owing to the degaussing gear with which the ship was fitted. The
two former compasses were adjusted by a Cardiff adjuster in Barry
Roads on the 11th March, and deviation cards were supplied to the
ship. Her steering gear was telemotor. She carried the Regulation
boats and life-saving gear and was supplied with an adequate number
of charts. She is fitted with reciprocating quadruple expansion
direct action vertical engines of 442 nominal horse-power, giving a
registered speed of 10¼ knots. At the time in question her speed
was about 9 to 10 knots. She was laden with about 5,500 tons of
Government stores and drew about 23 feet of water fore and aft.
After extensive repairs, mainly to machinery, the "NOLISEMENT"
sailed from Cardiff bound to the Clyde on 11th March, 1943. Her
master and deck officers were all new to the ship and to each
other, having only been aboard her for a few days. After adjusting
compasses at Barry Roads the "NOLISEMENT" proceeded. Whilst in the
Bristol Channel her machinery developed defects and her telemotor
gear acted sluggishly. She put into Milford Haven, where repairs
were executed, and the telemotor gear was examined, overhauled,
repaired and adjusted to the satisfaction of the ship's chief
engineer. The "NOLISEMENT" continued her voyage on the 21st March
at about 7 a.m., having been provided with Admiralty route
instructions. At about 10 a.m. in the neighbourhood of the Bishops
the steering gear did not function properly. It was disconnected,
examined and adjusted by the chief engineer and the managers'
engineer superintendent who was on board, and the ship continued on
her voy age at about noon. At 6.47 p.m. Bardsey Island was abeam,
distant three miles, and a course of 006 deg. was set. At 9.40 p.m.
South Stack Lighthouse was abeam at a distance, ascertained by four
point bearing, of four miles. Shortly afterwards the master ported
a point, and having run on for about ten minutes, put the ship back
on her original course. At about 10.30 p.m. Skerries Light was seen
nearly abeam. The master set a course of north by standard compass,
allowing 9 deg. westerly error. (The only observation for deviation
taken during the voyage was a sun azimuth at about 3 p.m. taken by
the second officer and giving an error of 11 deg. W.) In setting
his course, the master estimated that there would be two hours
flood tide, one hour slack and one hour ebb tide, before making the
Isle of Man. He estimated his ship's speed at 9 knots and the tide
at 2 knots. His intention was not to steer for the position given
in his instructions, but to make the Chickens Light ahead or
slightly on the starboard bow. The master described the visibility
at all material times as clear. The third officer at midnight
recorded the weather as hazy. The weather record from Chickens
Lighthouse makes no mention of haze. Having been on deck since
about 6 a.m. on the 21st, the master retired to his day room at
about 12.30 a.m. on the 22nd, leaving the second officer in charge
and assisted only by an A.B., who was on the look-out at the
material times, and an O.S. who was at the wheel. The master's
instructions to the second officer were that he had not made any
alteration in the course as an allowance for tides, but that the
officer should see the land or the Chickens Light ahead or fine on
the starboard bow, and that he was to call the master as soon as he
saw either, or if it came on thick. On coming on watch the second
officer had examined the chart and the master had informed him as
to his intentions, etc., but at no time did the second officer
himself check the course, tides, etc. The second officer's evidence
as to the visibility was that at midnight there was bright
moonlight with a fresh breeze and very little haze, and that by 1
a.m. the haze had increased, giving a visibility of only two to
three miles, and that this condition continued. At about 2.10 a.m.
the second officer on the starboard wing of the bridge observed
land about six points on the port bow at an estimated distance of a
mile or a little over a mile. He at once ordered hard-a-starboard,
keeping the engines at full speed, and called the master who
quickly arrived and ordered: "Keep your helm hard to starboard and
come round to the West." Shortly afterwards a beacon (which
subsequently proved to be the beacon on Carrick Rock) was observed
by the master about 4 points on the starboard bow at a time when
the ship had turned at least eight points to starboard. The master
then ordered the engines full speed astern, and various ahead and
astern movements were made during which the ship stranded on the
Isle of Man inside the Carrick Rock. Attempts were made to refloat
her by means of the engines, but they had to be stopped on account
of a broken eccentric strap, The ship was subsequently salved,
after receiving heavy structural damage. No lives were lost. No
report of the land was ever made by the look-out man, and at no
time was the Chickens Light seen by those on board the
"NOLISEMENT." There was no real evidence of abnormal tide and no
evidence of bad steering. In the opinion of the Court the fact that
the ship, apparently keeping her course, arrived some four miles to
the wrong side of the Chickens Light after a run of only some 40 to
50 miles, in fine veather, from her point of departure, of itself
shows that the course set was in all the circumstances most
unseamanlike. The court is satisfied that the high land seen
distant only about a mile or 1½ miles should have been soen very
much earlier than it was seen. The question of sounding has been
considered, and the Court is of the view that it would not have
given any assistance to the navigation in that locality. The master
was faced with many uncertainties: the constancy of his compasses,
the lack of observations for error, uncertainty as to the accuracy
of the patent log or the engines' speed, an untried and unproved
staff of officers, look-outs and helmsmen, uncertain tides and
visibility of lighthouses and land. In these circumstances the
Court is of opinion that the master in addition to setting a more
Westerly course should have remained on the bridge until the Isle
of Man was sighted, or should have given orders to be called at a
definite clock-time calculated to ensure his presence on the bridge
before the ship could have arrived in close proximity to the land.
When land was sighted broad on the wrong bow the ship's engines
should have been reversed and her way stopped until endeavours had
been made to ascertain her then position. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS. The Court's answers to the questions submitted by the Ministry
of War Transport are as follows: - | Q.1 | By whom was the s.s. "NOLISEMENT" owned? | | A.1 | The Nolisement Steamship Company of Cardiff. | | Q.2 | When the vessel left Milford Haven on the 21st March, 1943, was
she in good and seaworthy condition? | | A.2 | Yes. | | Q.3 | With how many compasses was the vessel fitted, and where were
they situated? When and by whom were they last professionally
adjusted? Were the correct deviations to be applied to them known
to those on board throughout the voyage? | | A.3 | Three, Standard Compass on top of wheelhouse, Steering Compass
in wheelhouse, and a steering compass aft. The two former were
adjusted on the 11th March, 1943, by Messrs. T.J. Williams &
Son, Ltd., Compass Adjusters, of Cardiff. Yes. | | Q.4 | With what sounding appliances was the vessel fitted? Were they
in efficient order when the vessel left Milford Haven on the 21st
March, 1943? | | A.4 | A Relvin type of sounding machine, in efficient order. | | Q.5 | Did the vessel carry any, and if so what, patent logs? | | A.5 | One Walkers Patent Log of the usual type. | | Q.6 | Was the vessel adequately supplied for the voyage with charts
and publications concerning navigation? | | A.6 | Yes. | | Q.7 | During the voyage from Milford Haven was any trouble
experienced with the steering gear? If so (a) what was it; and (b)
was it corrected? | | A.7 | Yes. (a) At about 10 a.m. on the 21st March, the steering gear
ceased to function properly. The trouble was due to air in the
pipes. (b) This was corrected. | | Q.8 | At what time did the vessel leave Milford Haven on the 21st
March, 1943? | | A.8 | At 7.20 a.m. | | Q.9 | When was the vessel's correct position last ascertained before
the stranding? (a) in what manner was it ascertained; (b) by whom
was it ascertained; and (c) what was it? | | A.9 | 9.40 p.m. on March 21st (a) by four-point bearing; (b) the
Master; (c) South Stack four miles bearing S.66.E (True). | | Q.10 | At What speed or speeds did the vessel proceed on her voyage
from the time when her correct position was last ascertained? | | A.10 | Full speed. | | Q.11 | What courses were set after the correct position of the vessel
was last ascertained? When and by whom were they set? | | A.11 | After passing S. Stack the course N.24.E(True) was altered to
about N.13.E(True) and maintained for about 10 minutes when the
original course was resumed. These alterations were made by the
Master. On passing Skerries Light at an uncertain time and
distance, course was altered to North by standard compass by the
Master. | | Q.12 | Between the time when the vessel's correct position was last
ascertained and the time of the stranding, were soundings taken? If
so, Where was the vessel when they were taken, and what were
they? | | A.12 | No. | | Q.13 | Between the times referred to in Question 12, what was the
state of (a) the weather; (b) the wind; (c) the tide; and (d)
visibility? | | A.13 | (a) fine; (b) easterly force 4 to 5; (c) setting to the
North-eastward for about 2 hours at the rate of about 3 knots;
slack for about one hour, and running to the south-eastward at
about 2 to 3 knots for about one hour. (d) the evidence was
conflicting. The Court finds that when approaching the Calf of Man
visibility was reduced by haze to a range of probably 2 to 3
miles. | | Q.14 | | | A.14. | | | Q.15 | Was a good and proper lookout kept on board the vessel? | | A.15 | No; the lookout man stationed on the port side of the bridge
saw land but thought it was a bank of fog and did not report it,
The Second Officer who was on the starboard wing of the bridge, and
expecting to make the land on the starbozrd side or ahead, did not
observe land until it was nearly on the port beam, when it could
only have been considerably less than 2 miles distant. | | Q.16 | Was the vessel navigated in a proper and seamanlike
manner? | | A.16 | No; a safe course was not set; it should have been much more
westerly (1) to comply with Admiralty instructions; and (2) having
regard to the uncertain factors of haze, tide, and lack of
certainty as to behaviour of compasses, and an unproved ship's
company. The Court considers the Master should have ordered the
Second Officer to have called him at a definite time to enable him
to make the landfall, especially having regard ?? to the
above-mentioned circumstances. The Court further considers that
th?? ship should have been stopped and reversed immediately land
was sighted, near the port beam. | | Q.17 | When and where did the vessel stand? | | A.17 | Northward of the Carrick Rocks, off the south coast of the Isle
of Man, ?? about or before 2.30 a.m. on the 22nd arch, 1943. | | Q.18 | What was the cause of the stranding of the vessel? | | A.18 | B??d navigation; see ?? to Nos. 15 and 16. | | Q.19 | Was the stranding of the s.s. "NOLISEMENT" caused or
contributed to by the wrongful act or default of her Master,
Captain Thomas James Williamson, and Second Officer, Edmund Thomas
Word, and her owners, The Nolisement Steamship Company Ltd., or
any, and, if so, which of them? | | A.19 | Cause of the stranding was the wrongful acts or omissions of
the Master, Captain Thomas James Williamson, and the Second
Officer, Edmund Thomas Ward. |
Certsi?? pertions of the Report of the Court h??ve been ommitted
in this copy in ??ecordance with a direction made under Section 6
of the Emergency Powers (Defence) Act, 1939. NOTE Report No. 7940 relates to a 1944 casualty ("Clearpool") and
will be found in the subsequent bound volume. |
|
|
|